California V. Hodari D.
| Use attributes for filter ! | |
| Date decided | 1991 |
|---|---|
| Dissent | Stevens |
| Marshall | |
| Majority | Scalia |
| Rehnquist | |
| White | |
| Blackmun | |
| Prior | Certiorari |
| Court of Appeal of California | |
| Date of Reg. | |
| Date of Upd. | |
| ID | 1396682 |
About California V. Hodari D.
California v. Hodari D. , 499 U. S. 621, was a United States Supreme Court case where the Court held that a fleeing suspect is not "seized" under the terms of the Fourth Amendment unless the pursuing officers apply physical force to the suspect or the suspect submits to officers' demands to halt.
