Education Trust photograph

Education Trust

Use attributes for filter !
Headquarters locationWashington, D. C. , United States
Date of Reg.
Date of Upd.
ID2479161
Send edit request

About Education Trust


The named person scheme to scrap the Scottish government

Feb 16,2020 6:23 am

First Minister Nicola Sturgeon was in question, the MSP made by the opposition about a named person, Mr Swinney, the statement

The Scottish government has to protect scrapped its controversial plan to appoint a named person to the welfare of Every Child in the country.

the scheme which was branded a "snooper's charter" by opponents, was introduced by his three years ago.

But it was delayed when the Supreme court, that.

education Secretary John Swinney has now confirmed that the resignation of the named person legislation.

The Conservatives said The Move is a "complete humiliation" for the government.

she called to ask Mr Swinney to excuse for the "millions of pounds of taxpayers 'money was wasted", and "all of the experts to The Front , faced with endless bureaucracy, to this policy".

have seen The Schema, a named person - usually A Teacher or health Visitor to act as a clear point of contact for Every Child from birth up to the age of 18 years.

In his ruling In July 2016, of the said Supreme court, the aim of the policy was "undoubtedly legitimate and benign," But that the proposals around disclosure of information violate The Right to privacy and Family Life under the European Convention on Human Rights .

The judge said that the proposals meant that it was "quite possible" that confidential information about a young person could be made available, in order to be a "wide range of public authorities, without either The Child or the young person or their parents aware".

Mr Swinney was subsequently mandated the establishment of a Commission of experts to make the search of a path, the person appointed, which is compatible with the Supreme court ruling.

But the panel has not been drawn to the exchange of information, and the conclusion that this "understanding is desirable" as the complexity would make it difficult to or apply in practice.

Mr Swinney told the Scottish Parliament on Thursday afternoon that the "mandatory persons named Schema for each child, supported by The Law , is not going to happen" and that "we revoke our account and the repeal of the relevant legislation. "

He said that the existing, voluntary schemes, continue to be a point of contact for the support - But only for those councils and health boards that want to, to you, and only for parents who wish to use them.

Mr Swinney said: "this is the way we support Our Children and Young People so that they can develop and the challenges and opportunities that life brings with itself. "

He added: "I believe that today we are able to support a significant Step Forward in providing families and practitioners with certainty about how the exchange of information, in a transparent way the respect of the Human Rights of all. "

Earlier on Thursday, the government asked for an investigation, according to Mr Swinney started were statement.

What has the Scottish government? The named person would have been for the majority of school-age children, A Teacher

The government says that they want Scotland "The Best place in The World , growing up in The Children ."

As part of the "Getting it Right for Every Child ' strategy, it is proposed that all children and Young People from birth to 18 years of age access to a named person under The Children and Young People (Scotland) Act 2014.

The designated person, which was intended to be a single point of contact for a child or your Parents Wanted when looking for information or advice, or if you wanted to talk about all the concerns and support.

it would also be a point of contact for other services, if you are wellbeing, any concerns about a child.

The Law was in force throughout the country on 31 August 2016, But the policy had already been rolled out in parts of Scotland, including Highland, Edinburgh, Fife, Angus and South Ayrshire.

Why was it so controversial?

The legal challenge was Not the Named persons (NO2NP) coalition, The Christian Institute, Care (Christian Action Research and Education), Tyme trust and The Family Education Trust .

The Group argued that the named person legislation would lead to "unjustified and unjustifiable interference of The State in The Family , rights" and that the responsibility for the monitoring of The Child 's well-being, The Role of the parents, not The State .

her arguments were previously dismissed as "exaggeration" by the Court of Session in Edinburgh, the said named person to belittle The Role of the parents and would have "no impact on the legal, moral, or social relations within The Family ".

Some organizations warned that the legislation was the wording meant The Role of the designated person open to wide interpretation.

And the Scottish Parent Teacher Council released the results of an online survey in 2013, which it said suggested that "high concern" from parents about the proposals.

However, children's charities, including Barnardo's, Aberlour, action for children and children 1. to make accused opponents of The System of statements about a named person is "inaccurate and unfounded".

What has been the reaction?

NO2NP said Mr Swinney's statement "effectively, the detested" Big Brother "scheme of legislative trash fuck", and predicted that parents would be "very pleased" by The Move .

But The Group said the government should be spared ditched The Plan "a long time ago, and a lot of time and a lot of money and a lot of anxiety. "

Scottish Conservative education spokeswoman Liz Smith said: "This is a complete humiliation for the SNP. Common Sense should have told you years ago that this policy was generally unpopular and unusable.

"In the meantime, millions of pounds of taxpayers' money was wasted, as the time should have been spent in order to meet the challenges facing our most vulnerable children. "

The EIS teaching Union said named person was originally conceived as a "genuine attempt to ensure that the protection for vulnerable and at-risk Young People from the whole of Scotland was as robust as it could be, to ensure that children through the cracks in The System , and the strengthening of support for people with needs that require a multi-Agency approach.

"the legislation is not always The Best way to achieve these goals, we must not lose sight of that still exists, to deliver that Ambition . "



child protection, scottish government, children

Source of news: bbc.com

Related Persons

Next Profile ❯