Greg Hands
Use attributes for filter ! | |
Gender | Male |
---|---|
Age | 59 |
Date of birth | November 14,1965 |
Zodiac sign | Scorpio |
Born | New York |
United States | |
Spouse | Irina Hundt |
Party | Conservative Party |
Official site | parliament.uk |
Position | Member of Parliament of the United Kingdom |
Member of Parliament of the United Kingdom since 2010 | |
Education | University of Cambridge |
Dr Challoner's Grammar School | |
Nationality | American |
British | |
Previous position | Minister of State for Trade Policy of the United Kingdom (2022–2023) |
Date of Reg. | |
Date of Upd. | |
ID | 416232 |
Greg Hands Life story
Gregory William Hands is a British politician who has served as the Member of Parliament for Chelsea and Fulham, previously Hammersmith and Fulham, since 2005. A member of the Conservative Party, he has served as its Chairman since February 2023.
David Cameron vows to support Rishi Sunak after surprise cabinet comeback
... Former transport minister Richard Holden became Tory party chairman, taking over from Greg Hands...
Rachel Reeves denies claims of plagiarism in new book
... " Tory chairman Greg Hands said the claims were " potentially very serious"...
Tamworth and Mid Beds by-elections: Keir Starmer hails results as game-changer
... Tory Party Chair Greg Hands said the losses were down to voters staying at home, rather than switching to Labour...
Labour overturns huge majorities to inflict two by-election defeats on Tories
... Tory Party chairman Greg Hands said the results were " disappointing" but that the " biggest problem was Conservative voters staying at home"...
Nigel Farage leaves door open to re-joining Tories after election
... Conservative Party chairman Greg Hands seemed deeply unimpressed with this idea, saying the former UKIP leader had campaigned against the Tories for years and did not want them to succeed...
Don't give up on HS2, Tory mayor Andy Street urges Rishi Sunak
... " Asked about Mr Street s intervention, Conservative Party chairman Greg Hands told the BBC ministers were still looking at the evidence...
Tory 'turmoil' blamed for slow Islamophobia action
... Conservative Party chairman Greg Hands said the party had made " significant progress" on Prof Singh s original recommendations, with 25 complete and just six ongoing...
Next election not lost, says Rishi Sunak after by-election defeats
... Conservative chairman Greg Hands conceded there was a " lot of work still to be done" to meet the promises, adding they " weren t designed to be an easy thing to meet"...
Rachel Reeves denies claims of plagiarism in new book
By Becky MortonPolitical reporter
Rachel Reeves has denied claims of plagiarism, after it emerged some passages of her new book were lifted from sources including Wikipedia.
The Shadow chancellor's book included reproduced material without acknowledgment.
A spokesperson for Ms Reeves rejected The accusations, adding: " These were inadvertent mistakes and will be rectified in future reprints. "
Tory chairman Greg Hands said The claims were " potentially very serious".
The Book , The Women Who Made Modern Economics, was launched at an Institute for Government event on Wednesday evening.
Ms Reeves, a former Bank of England economist, is hoping to become The country's first female chancellor if Labour wins The Next general election.
The Financial Times said its reporters had spotted More Than 20 examples of apparent plagiarism in The Book , including entire sentences and paragraphs.
It said these mostly contained biographical information.
The Bbc has checked The examples highlighted by The FT and found some material in The Book was very similar to online sources.
For example, a sentence about The Relationship between author H. G. Wells and economist Beatrice Webb is identical to one.
Another paragraph about international aid under New Labour is very similar to a foreword Written By Hilary Benn , who is now The Shadow Northern Ireland secretary,
Only a few words in The paragraph in The Book differ from Mr Benn 's foreword.
Publisher Basic Books said: " When factual sentences were taken from primary sources, they should have been rewritten and properly referenced.
" We acknowledge this did not happen in every case. As always in instances such as these, we will review all sources and ensure any omissions are rectified in future reprints. "
The Statement added: " At no point did Rachel seek to present these facts as original research.
" There is an extensive and selective bibliography of over 200 books, articles and interviews.
" Where facts are taken from multiple sources, no author would be expected to reference each and every one. "
Mr Hands said Ms Reeves needed to " explain herself urgently".
" Labour literally have no new plans for This Country , " he wrote on X, branding Ms Reeves a " copy and paste shadow chancellor".
A source close to Ms Reeves said she wrote The Book herself but was helped by research assistants, who worked on biographical material.
They stressed " this is factual stuff, not views, policies or ideas".
At The Book 's launch event, which took place The evening before The Financial Times article was published, Ms Reeves was asked how she found The Time to write it.
In response She Said : " My Day job is pretty consuming and I've got two primary aged children but I wanted to carve out Time to write this book.
" In The acknowledgements I acknowledged The research assistants That I had, particularly on The facts and The Detail That went into The pen portraits of The Women That I speak about.
" And That came from a range of sources, from books, from interviews, from articles, from Wikipedia. "
Book launches at Westminster are ten-a-penny.
You can measure how an author is perceived - and which way The political wind is thought to be blowing - by who and how many turn out for a book launch.
If you manage to justify having an " overflow room" and there is an excitable vibe about The warm White Wine clutching attendees, Westminster is collectively saying you're on The Up .
At Rachel Reeves 's book launch on Wednesday night, there was That vibe and there was That overflow room.
The whole thing oozed with a sense of perceived imminent power: That The author of The Book , The Women Who Made Modern Economics, would soon be chancellor of The exchequer.
Well, let's See - That 's for The electorate to decide.
But with hindsight her reference to Wikipedia in The question and answer Session - which struck me as odd at The Time - Sounds rather like a reference in advance to The criticism she knew was coming.
The whole premise of her book is there has been a whole load of economists overlooked and uncredited for their work.
So it's unfortunate, to say The least, That That is precisely what she is now being accused of.
Related TopicsSource of news: bbc.com