Indians
| Use attributes for filter ! | |
| Gender | Male |
|---|---|
| Born | Denmark |
| Genres | Independent Music |
| Record labels | 4AD |
| Albums | Somewhere Else |
| The Dance of the Souls | |
| Date of Reg. | |
| Date of Upd. | |
| ID | 2430777 |
Indians Life story
Indians is the moniker and alter ego of Danish singer-songwriter and musician Søren Løkke Juul signed to 4AD record label. In concerts, he is accompanied by some musicians also collectively known as Indians.
Slums hidden as India puts on its best face for G20
... But that is changing under Mr Modi - Indians are aspirational, they care about their image in the world and so does Mr Modi...
What's drawing so many Indians to Australia?
... The chefs and restaurateurs behind these experiments are among more than 710,000 Indians who live in Australia, one of the world s biggest " immigrant nations"...
Indian film RRR: Why the action spectacle is charming the West
... Director SS Rajamouli has said that he made RRR mainly for Indians - people living in the country and the diaspora...
Why the West is reckoning with caste bias now
... Dalit activists say that for decades, discrimination practised by upper-caste Indians - especially in universities and technology firms - didn t get attention...
Parag Agrawal: Why Indian-born CEOs dominate Silicon Valley
... " From birth certificates to death certificates, from school admissions to getting jobs, from infrastructural inadequacies to insufficient capacities, " growing up in India equips Indians to be " natural managers, " he adds, quoting the famous Indian corporate strategist C K Prahalad...
George Floyd: Can President Trump ready for the military?
... The law was adopted in 1807 to allow the President to call out the militia to protect against hostile incursions of the Indians, and it was subsequently extended to the use of the U...
General election 2019: Labour seeks to calm Hindu voters' anger
... This provoked much anger from Indians - most of whom are of Hindu faith - in the UK and abroad...
Kashmir dispute: India PM Modi defends lifting special status
... While many Indians welcomed the move and lauded Mr Modi s government for its decisiveness, others criticised India for what they said were heavy-handed and even unconstitutional tactics...
George Floyd: Can President Trump ready for the military?
As the protests spread in the United States, President Trump has threatened to send in the army to end the unrest.
Mr Trump said he would send in the military, if the cities and States failed to solve The Problem .
Getty ImagesIf a town, city or state refuses to take the measures necessary. Then I'm going to deploy the US military Donald trumpU.S. President
But have not said some of The State governors, the government have The Power to send in Federal troops without the permission of The State authorities.
The President Can forces?In Short , Yes, under certain circumstances.
There are already thousands of soldiers from the National Guard , the reserve force for the U.S. army.
you are in More Than 20 States across the US are trying to protests, but these forces were requested by the cities or The States themselves.
But a U.S. law in the 19Th Century , the circumstances under which the government in Washington Dc can intervene shall, without the approval of the government.
Act The National Guard , the Army Reserve forceThe insurgency, says the approval of the governors is not necessary, if The President determines that The Situation is in a state that makes it impossible to enforce U.S. laws, or if the rights of citizens are threatened.
The Law was adopted in 1807 to allow The President to call out the militia to protect against "hostile incursions of The Indians ," and it was subsequently extended to the use of the U.S. military in domestic political unrest and the protection of civil rights.
Another law of 1878 requires congressional approval for domestic military use, but a legal expert told The Bbc that the riot act was a sufficient legal power on its own, for The President , the deployment of the army.
It is generally accepted that The President would deal with a legal basis to the military, without asking for the approval from The States , which in the current circumstances.
Stephen Vladeck , the University of Texas law professor, was quoted in the US media, saying: "Historically and practically, such a desire is a prerequisite to The President with regular federal troops for domestic law enforcement authorities is not necessarily. "
The Law Has been used in The Past ?After the uprising of Act dozens of times, it was used in The Past , although not for almost three decades.
It was last invoked in 1992 by former US President George HW Bush during the race riots in Los Angeles .
The Law was used during the 1950s and 60s, during the civil rights era, the three different presidents, including, if the objections of state governors.
President Dwight Eisenhower faced objections, if he forces of The Law in 1957, to send US to Arkansas, to the control of a protest in a school where black and white children were taught together.
Since The End of the 1960s, the use of The Law was rare. Congress amended it in 2006 after the hurricane "Katrina" in an attempt, the military support is more effective, but The Amendment was repealed after state governors objected.
reality check, george floyd death, donald trump, united states
Source of news: bbc.com
